Project Jupiter — Celaya Solutions

El Paso Water and Grid Analysis

Project
Jupiter

Data center demand at 197% of grid surplus capacity. Significant discrepancies between stated and permitted plant sizes. Sealed Envelope Protocol. Active litigation.

View Analysis GitHub: The Numbers

Case Active

197%

Demand vs surplus

SEP

Sealed envelope

Live

GitHub Pages

Scroll

Key Findings

The numbers
nobody published.

197%

Demand vs Surplus Capacity

Data center electricity demand for the El Paso region was found to be at 197% of available grid surplus capacity. This finding was documented, hashed, and anchored before publication.

Gap

Stated vs Permitted

Significant discrepancies were documented between publicly stated plant sizes and actual permitted capacity. The gap between what was announced and what was permitted is the central finding.

SEP

Sealed Envelope Protocol

Both the water demand analysis and the grid analysis were anchored to Solana blockchain via EPPE before publication. The timestamps are immutable. The findings existed before the case.

D-307

Active Litigation Reference

Case D-307-CV-2025-02766. The Project Jupiter analysis is referenced in active litigation. The Solana transaction IDs serve as independent timestamp verification.

GitHub

Published and Live

celaya-solutions/Project-Jupiter-El-Paso-Water-The-Numbers-Nobody-Published. GitHub Pages live. The analysis is public, permanent, and independently verifiable.

El Paso Civic Infrastructure

Project Jupiter is civic infrastructure built for El Paso. The grid and water analyses directly affect the community where Christopher was born and operates. This is not abstract research.

If the data exists,
it should be published
before anyone asks.

Project Jupiter began with a simple question: what does the public data actually say about El Paso's water demand and grid capacity? The answer was 197% and a documented gap between stated and permitted plant sizes. The Sealed Envelope Protocol made the findings timestamped evidence before they became legally relevant.

Methodology

Sealed Envelope
Protocol.

The Sealed Envelope Protocol ensures that findings exist as verified evidence before any public claim is made. Hash the analysis. Anchor it on Solana. Then publish. The blockchain timestamp is independent of any party in the dispute.

Step 01: Analysis completed and documented.
Step 02: Document hashed via EPPE (SHA-256, local only).
Step 03: Hash anchored to Solana — immutable timestamp.
Step 04: Published to GitHub Pages.
Step 05: Transaction ID retained as litigation reference.

Evidence Record

Water Analysis

Anchored — Solana

Grid Analysis

Anchored — Solana

GitHub

Pages Live

Case Reference

D-307-CV-2025-02766

Identity

Protected — Initials only

Sources

No backdoors

Access and Submission

The data is public.
Submit yours through EPPE.

The Project Jupiter analysis is published and open. If you have relevant evidence relating to El Paso water or grid infrastructure, EPPE provides a way to timestamp and anchor it before it becomes legally relevant. No sign-up. No tracking.

View Full Analysis

GitHub Pages — The Numbers Nobody Published

→

Submit Evidence via EPPE

Hash and anchor your documents — no account required

→

Research Contact

hello@celayasolutions.com

→

Project Status

Case Active

Key Finding

197% demand vs surplus

Discrepancy

Stated vs Permitted gap

Protocol

Sealed Envelope

Chain

Solana — Anchored

GitHub

Pages Live

Press

NYT Texas / EP Matters

Project Record

From data to
evidence to litigation.

Analysis

Water demand and grid capacity analysis completed.

The analysis began with publicly available data. The 197% finding emerged from the grid analysis: data center electricity demand projections for the El Paso region against documented surplus capacity. The gap between stated and permitted plant sizes was a separate finding from the water demand analysis.

Sealed

Sealed Envelope Protocol applied.

Both analyses were hashed via EPPE and anchored to Solana before publication. The timestamp is independent of any party. The findings existed on the blockchain before they became relevant to litigation.

Published

GitHub Pages live.

celaya-solutions/Project-Jupiter-El-Paso-Water-The-Numbers-Nobody-Published. Published with the Sealed Envelope methodology documented inline. The Solana transaction IDs are embedded in the repository.

Press

NYT Texas Editor and El Paso Matters outreach.

Fernando Alfonso at the NYT Texas desk made contact regarding the Civic Ledger and Project Jupiter work. El Paso Matters also reached out. Christopher responded with authentic voice, no corporate polish. The evidence-first framing held.

Active

Case D-307-CV-2025-02766 — Active.

Project Jupiter analysis is referenced in active litigation. The Solana transaction IDs serve as independent timestamp verification. The case is ongoing. The data is public. The timestamps are immutable.